The Future of I doser (illegal maybe)

[Zukamimotu]

I am pretty much surprised that most of you here think it's impossible for the government to ban I-DOSER because it's simply not harmful. Hey, weed isn't and was never harmful to anyone, they still made it illegal, for economic fucking reasons that is. I am pretty sure you all know why they banned weed, they could say the same exact thing about I-DOSER:

If taken while driving a car, it can be dangerous. BLABLABLABLABLABLA.

You know, this kind of speech.

Actually, they banned weed because William Randolph or whatever his name was had a monopoly on wood-paper and a billion dollars. Hemp paper was becoming big, so he used his money to shut that industry down. Then, using his news paper, he spread all sorts of lies about it being harmful. Such bullshit, I know.

In reference to it curing drug addiction, I've seen it happen. It's no secret that's one of the reasons I advocate it strongly.

[SadLittlePony]

You're comparing what is essentially music (I suppose) to child porn? That...makes no fucking sense.

I sincerely doubt they will make idoser illegal. If they did, they'd have to ban static on the radio, and snow on tv, since that's essentially all you're hearing!

Unless it makes people go out and eat their children's eyes, I doubt it will be mad illegal.

It actually makes perfect sense. But somehow you missed it.
They are both media. They are both banable by government.
But even though child porn is illegal its still obtainable.
His point was that law wouldnt stop anyone.

[chain_yanker]

The Feds could eaisly pass a law banning this type of audio.

To quote Mark Twain:
"Supse you were an idiot. And supose you were a member of congress. But I repeat myself."

[kingcobra]

What people need to realize is that this is an issue of listening to audio files, not about a particular type. The government cannot merely sanction a particular type of audio file from a particular company. You cannot separate binaural beats from music which only can be differentiated by genre. So while in theory binaural beats can be made illegal, they would have to make listening to recorded music illegal as well. That of course is ridiculous, as is this whole discussion.

What they could do though is regulate it, meaning that kids in school wouldn't be allowed to listen to it, but once again they would have to prohibit listening in general, and they'd have to do that anyway for the ban to be effective. This isn't a legal matter per se though and they can ban all sorts of behavior that otherwise may be legal outside of school.

Considering our deep craving for drugs, some of which are definitely harmful, any time we can obtain a reasonable facsimile without even the possibility of harmful effects, that's certainly a good thing. So i-doser may be seen to at least potentially making a very meaningful contribution to society, and whether you are for or against the use of recreational drugs, they certainly have their dark side, and i-doser offers at least a good taste of the high for many people without the downside. What a beautiful time to be alive!

[SpaceMiNd]

I just read this and imagined how funny it would be to see a guy getting arrested for listening to music, the only way they could attempt to ban I-Doser is if the FBI shuts it down, but really, I don't see that happening,

[GregM]

Speaking for the United States, the notion of the government banning binaural recordings are slim to none. The factors come down to freedom of speech. I've read the posts of schools banning, etc. The fact of the matter is, schools are allowed to do things like that. Sure they can take the electronics away, but they have to make it available to the parents after being confiscated. Why would you be doing this in a school anyway?
Let me digress here, binaural records are in fact speech. Although the courts really shouldn't be the final say on things(as the framers did not intend for this [different discussion]), the courts would knock any law like this down. Speech extends to corporations as it should, as the entity in legal terms are a person. Not one that can vote per say but one that is made up of people (if a corporation the stock holders). I am getting into legal jargon. But no, I can not see binaural recordings being outlawed.
.......
Unless the unintended fourth branch of the government the administrative branch(as I like to call it) were to somehow sneak in and try to regulate free speech. It depends upon how SCOTUS rules on the health care act. If everything is considered constitutional -- now the government could say well this is bad for your health. Administratively banned. Courts have limited jurisdiction over the administrative branch.

[Trance750]

Speaking for the United States, the notion of the government banning binaural recordings are slim to none.

While that may be, you just know they'd love to try to fine people (just think of the revenue they could generate). It's a known fact that the jails and prisons receive so much $ inmate, so they would like to find a way to keep them filled to capacity

It's all about the money, peeps. Always has been. Always will be

[SadLittlePony]

What happened to the true america where we are all meant to be free.

[Basikx]

Well if it'll be illegal in the future, I would probably kill myself. The Government is telling you what you can do and what you can't with your body.

[Trance750]

What happened to the true america where we are all meant to be free.

Really the 'Land of The Free' doesn't apply any more... unless you're rich

[Legalize It]

If America was stupid enough to do this just save your doses on a micro sd card and hide it lol

[DarkWarez]

To be honest, I wouldn't be surprised. But these are just HZ frequencies we're dealing with, not physical material that can harm your body. I-Doser cannot hurt you in any way, but if something as un-harmful as Marijuana can be illegal, this can too.

[Qwazz]

It will always be on the net anyways....

[ColorsLookFunny]

All that i know is that if i hear any news of it becoming illegal i'm burning it all to hundreds of CD's and selling them.

[SpaceMiNd]

The question to asks here is "Why would they ban it?" Now, I know our government can be really unreasonable but they can only ban something if they have a reason for it (whether that reason was engineered by the government is a whole 'nother story) a reason like someone died off of it, or has killed somebody while under the influence, however since it is almost impossible to tell if someone has been dosing since there are no visible traces or stereotypes accustomed with dosing like with real drugs (like track marks, addiction, traces in fat like weed, and other things) the only exception to this is if they can get someone to perform an EEG on you, but by then the effects could be long gone. So, it would be difficult but not impossible to have a reason to ban I-Doser, but since the effects of I-Dosing are more beneficial than detrimental, I highly doubt it will ever happen.
Happy Dosing - SpaceMiNd