Heh, actually the more popular skeptics explination is it is a virtual world created by the mind(as this is less mystic then travelling back through time

). It may have influences from memories but basically anything could be created and/or experienced. They take the similarity to the lucid dream to assume they are the same.
Either way both of those assumptions ignore all the actual observed objective experiences(that people have never done before, or more importantly never could have known without some sort of actual perception outside of the body)that people have seen and remembered and verified when returning "back" to the body.
In fact, it's you're explination that would fit the error you cited a bit better, as the implications of the experience would most likley be so conflicting with the beliefs that allow the comfort zone of "knowing" what's right within the confines of what you are told is right and wrong, real and not. It goes along with all the theories of rising and falling dreams being the mind's translation of obe/ap sensations/experiences that it doesn't/can't accept.
Who knows though, we're all probably horribly wrong, it kinda sucks our biggest fear is the unknown, if not perhaps we might be more accepting of it and wouldn't rush to comforting conclusions(and if change wasn't another we might not connect to them so vehemently).
And good point NWA, how do we really know we are in our bodies, or that we actually have bodies at all?
